Advertise here
Hourly Auctions
Win the ad, or your money back!

Welcome Guest - Login / Register Forum - Brainstorm - Referral Income

Referral Income

Sticky threads

Latest Posts

Traffic Value: $10,524.3446 Australia
3 like this post 0 people
18/08/2017 00:37
What currently happens if User A refers User B, but then User A does not keep their account active? Does their referral income continue to build, but in reality just sit there when they might never come back?

If that is the case, could we introduce a referral income rule that says the referrer will receive their income only if they keep their own account active (or for a defined period of time).

If they do not, the referral income then goes to MTV.
Traffic Value: $7,212.45963 Malaysia
0 like this post 0 people
18/08/2017 01:11
I agree for this one...only active user eligible to receive referral commission

user active either PV or MTV...
Traffic Value: $283.24108 Philippines
0 like this post 0 people
18/08/2017 01:12
Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States
8 like this post 0 people
18/08/2017 01:39
I don't agree.

I'm fine with passive members who bring in active members.
They will get taxed ofc, but other than that, if they bring in members who earn them ref commission, they are a valued member as well as who they brought in.

On top of that, the site can use, "as last resort", the balances of inactive members to pay off a hosting bill or staff member, and then balance the books later. Call it a slush fund, and no need to program anything.

Programming costs too much money just to get those who refer people (who are valuable members who are often more of the passive type) to do something to be active enough.

Besides, the inactive fund balances is not of a significant amount.
Remember, we did "reset" balances, so of the $119K, how much revenue (that need not be refunded) do we gain, by changing the terms?
Forum - Brainstorm - Referral Income
Subscribe to this Topic