Welcome Guest - Login / Register Forum - Brainstorm - Referral Income
Referral Income
Sticky threads
Latest Posts
1.
Discuss the news!
Brainstorm - stra
2.
News - Read Only
News - slosumo
3.
How long does it takes a…
Questions - DomingoX6
4.
payment to otcshare
Questions - alva5763
5.
change ltc withdraw address
Questions - DomingoX6
6.
Email confirmation ¡¡issue!!
Questions - slosumo
|
fraser
Traffic Value: $11,569.46477 Australia
18/08/2017
00:37
What currently happens if User A refers User B, but then User A does not keep their account active? Does their referral income continue to build, but in reality just sit there when they might never come back?If that is the case, could we introduce a referral income rule that says the referrer will receive their income only if they keep their own account active (or for a defined period of time). If they do not, the referral income then goes to MTV.
donsoulz
Traffic Value: $7,212.45963 Malaysia
18/08/2017
01:11
I agree for this one...only active user eligible to receive referral commissionuser active either PV or MTV...
richiem
Traffic Value: $680.27326 Philippines
18/08/2017
01:12
Agree.
druth8x
Traffic Value: $22,417.44153 United States
18/08/2017
01:39
I don't agree.I'm fine with passive members who bring in active members. They will get taxed ofc, but other than that, if they bring in members who earn them ref commission, they are a valued member as well as who they brought in. On top of that, the site can use, "as last resort", the balances of inactive members to pay off a hosting bill or staff member, and then balance the books later. Call it a slush fund, and no need to program anything. Programming costs too much money just to get those who refer people (who are valuable members who are often more of the passive type) to do something to be active enough. Besides, the inactive fund balances is not of a significant amount. Remember, we did "reset" balances, so of the $119K, how much revenue (that need not be refunded) do we gain, by changing the terms? |
